Skip to Main Content
Nintex Ideas

đź‘‹ Use this site to provide feedback and ideas for all Nintex Products. See our post on Nintex Community "Welcome to Nintex Ideas" for more details on Nintex Ideas, how an idea is handled by our product teams and more!


If you have questions about Nintex Ideas, please contact ideas@nintex.com

If you require support, please visit Nintex Customer Central

If you have a sales inquiry, please contact sales@nintex.com

ADD A NEW IDEA

Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp)

Showing 1002 of 2465

Ability to add Spaces to system names

We have many systems within our company that use more than one word. When I went to add Process Manager as a new System, the database wouldn't let me add "Process Manager" as two separate words, so I had to use an underscore and name it "Process_M...
Guest over 1 year ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / General 1 Open for voting

Add Review Date for Improvement Module

We would like a review period for Improvements similar to Risk and Process reviews. This is to ensure the improvement actions embedded as part of BAU are working as expected. When the review date comes up the Portfolio owner and Incident owner can...
Jackie Paterson over 1 year ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Improvement Management 1 Under Review

Show user a different message for unpublished processes (not access denied)

Sharing processes is the great strength of Promapp, but we still find that some experts/owners get confused about who can/cannot see processes that are not yet published. Quite regularly I will get requests for "access" to Promapp which are actu...
Damian Light over 5 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / General 1 Planned

Moved documents remain in original folder/s - have to be manually moved

Documents attached to processes that are moved to another group should not remain in the original group or provide an option to select 'remove from this group'. With organisational restructures, processes can be moved and the extra work required t...
Guest almost 4 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Documents 3 Open for voting

Feedback Response Required Option or Information Only Required to check one

I continually have to submit a Placeholder feedback for feedback submitted without checking the box "response required" It would be helpful, if another option was added, information only and require one to be checked before they submit. This would...
Tinika 2 months ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Process Feedback 0 Open for voting

Resend Awaiting Approval Notifications from the Dashboard

We have processes which are currently awaiting approval ranging from a few days old to a few years. We would like a way to re-send/push out awaiting for approval email notifications from the dashboard to prompt users to go into their dashboard and...
Guest 11 months ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Dashboard & Notifications 0 Open for voting

Search role list when doing user maintenance

We have a lot of roles and you need to scroll down the list to add or change a role. It would be helpful to have a search capability in this pop up box, or be able to jump to the section by alphabet.

Auto generate combined process map

One of the major strength's of Promapp is the ability to connect individual processes to show the bigger picture and create context. To help create this, some of our teams are creating 'overview' processes which are made up of Process Links (no ad...
Damian Light over 5 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / General 1 Open for voting

Disable 'Submit for Approval' while @TODO items are present

There are instances when process editors overlook resolving @TODO items prior to submitting processes for approval. It would be helpful if the system could prevent the submission of processes while there are unresolved @TODO items present. Perhaps...
Guest about 5 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / General 5 Open for voting

Configure Reference no. as required field

Promasters should be able to configure if the 'Reference no.' field is required for publishing the process. This should be a master config setting that can be enabled, and then should also be able to be controlled at the Process Group level (simil...
Jonathan Butler 5 months ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / General 0 Open for voting