Skip to Main Content
Nintex Ideas

đź‘‹ Use this site to provide feedback and ideas for all Nintex Products. See our post on Nintex Community "Welcome to Nintex Ideas" for more details on Nintex Ideas, how an idea is handled by our product teams and more!


If you have questions about Nintex Ideas, please contact ideas@nintex.com

If you require support, please visit Nintex Customer Central

If you have a sales inquiry, please contact sales@nintex.com

ADD A NEW IDEA

All ideas

Web Service - support for HTTP

Call a Webservice should support HTTP not just HTTPS
Guest almost 10 years ago in Nintex Workflow (formerly Nintex Automation Cloud) / Runtime 3 Not Planned

Prevent users being disabled if they are a PO or PE

It is currently possible to disable users when they are a PO/PE.There is no warning to tell you that you need to reassign their process ownership/expert responsibilities. Then when you go to reassign their processes as Process Owner, if the Proces...
Guest almost 6 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / User Management 1 Open for voting

Add 'Exclude Archive folder' to Unpublished/InProgress Process List report

I routinely run the Unpublished/InProgress Process List report to gauge our improvement in business process mapping health, and to drive process engagement and improvement.Currently, the report includes all processes in Archive folders/sub-folders...
Guest almost 4 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Reporting 0 Open for voting

Dictionary variable

Dictionary variable to hold paired value such as e.g. 1 = 1:"One", 2:"Two", 3:"Three" e.g. 2 = key1:[1:2:3:4:5], key2:[2:3:4:5:6] e.g. 3 = key1:value1, key2:value2, key3:value3 etc.
Guest almost 10 years ago in Nintex Workflow (formerly Nintex Automation Cloud) / Workflow Designer 2 Not Planned

Promaster automation tool and reports

As a promaster I need to make promapp reflect my organisation. My organisation changes quickly so I need a way that I can update promaster users with roles, responsibilities, ownership and rights every day. Bronze level option : give Promasters th...
Dorje McKinnon almost 4 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / User Management 1 Open for voting

Daily Promapp email to end users only during business days

The email to end users only has an option for daily, weekly and monthly. We would like to have an option for business days (M-F).
Guest almost 4 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Dashboard & Notifications 0 Open for voting

Native support for Azure Active Directory

Unfortunately NWC forces us to use Auth0/Okta as a middleware identity provider instead of offering a native Azure Active Directory connection. This puts us in a tough spot from an IT security / data privacy perspective because the Auth0 servers a...
Joachim Dobler almost 4 years ago in Nintex Workflow (formerly Nintex Automation Cloud) / Other 3 Not Planned

Add a Note in LEDD about "Relationships from other objects"

The Relationship from other objects section on standard objects automatically populate relationships that do not work and it is very confusing. Please make a note about these relationships in the Interface as these require Button parameters to wor...
Brent Byhre almost 2 years ago in Documents / DDP Management and Creation 0 Open for voting

Separator component

When laying out a page, it is very common to want to separate blocks of content with a line. A lot of drag-and-drop page builders have a separator that you can drag onto the page and set the color, thickness, padding, etc. Currently, to accomplish...
Joseph Nichols almost 2 years ago in Nintex Apps 0

Allow Promaster to turn off Process Archived notifications

This feature is annoying as the Process Owner was spammed with three emails advising that a Process has been emailed. Is this feature required when only the Promaster and Process Owner can archive a process? Surely the Promaster would only archive...
Guest almost 2 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Dashboard & Notifications 0 Open for voting