Nintex Ideas

đŸ‘‹ Use this site to provide feedback and ideas for all Nintex Products. See our post on Nintex Community "Welcome to Nintex Ideas" for more details on Nintex Ideas, how an idea is handled by our product teams and more!


If you have questions about Nintex Ideas, please contact ideas@nintex.com

If you require support, please visit Nintex Customer Central

If you have a sales inquiry, please contact sales@nintex.com

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Open for voting
Workspace Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp)
Categories Process Review & Approval
Created by Pawel Stolarczyk
Created on Mar 20, 2024

RELATED IDEAS

Publish date as start of next review date

Today Publishing and reviewing are not linked. I can publish new process versions after update but still process will be overdue because of next review date. It is very confusing for users and process owners.

I propose to use process publish date as start of next review date. This solution will reduce process waste which is manual date manipulation and people wont be confused about process update.

  • Attach files
  • Anna Officer
    Reply
    |     May 5, 2024

    Hi, our users were reporting same confusion, I have turned the ‘Enable explicit process reviews (Default: On)’ to off which resets the review date based on date last published. The only issue is that the user now has to edit the process to mark it as 'reviewed'. I am advising if no changes are required they should just write reviewed and applicable date under the background section as a workaround. I would prefer if users could still use the 'reviewed it' button with explicit reviews off.