Skip to Main Content
Nintex Ideas

đź‘‹ Use this site to provide feedback and ideas for all Nintex Products. See our post on Nintex Community "Welcome to Nintex Ideas" for more details on Nintex Ideas, how an idea is handled by our product teams and more!


If you have questions about Nintex Ideas, please contact ideas@nintex.com

If you require support, please visit Nintex Customer Central

If you have a sales inquiry, please contact sales@nintex.com

Status Not Planned
Created by Anthony Kumnick
Created on Aug 15, 2019

Remove declined processes from the publish list...

As a publisher. Once Ive declined a process I want it removed from my list...i.e. it should be automatically sent back to "In Progress" status.
What Im having to do now is go in and edit and save the process to remove it from the list.
  • ADMIN RESPONSE
    Sep 7, 2022
    Thank you very much for posting your feedback. At this time, we will not be adding this request to the near-term backlog, as we are focused on improving our search and process variation capabilities and delivering sequential approvals. However, we reevaluate requests every quarter and will reach out if priorities change. Please keep the feedback coming as it is critical for our longer-term planning.
  • Attach files
  • Kerry Hiki
    Reply
    |
    Sep 7, 2022
    Thanks for the suggestion. I'll open this up for voting to gather interest from other clients.
  • Geoff Wainwright
    Reply
    |
    Sep 7, 2022
    I raised this with Promapp some time ago. I'm perplexed as to why they think this is an "enhancement" to be voted upon rather than poor design logic that needs to be rectified. The fact that a publisher can decline a process, yet it remains in their publish queue with a "publish" button next to it is kind of bizarre.
  • Monica McDaniel
    Reply
    |
    Sep 7, 2022
    I agree with Geoff Wainwright's comment. This default behavior results in a cluttered publisher dashboard and is a basic queue design issue.
  • Alison
    Reply
    |
    Sep 7, 2022
    Has there been any movement on this given that it was raised over 2 years ago now?