👋 Use this site to provide feedback and ideas for all Nintex Products. See our post on Nintex Community "Welcome to Nintex Ideas" for more details on Nintex Ideas, how an idea is handled by our product teams and more!
If you are looking for the Nintex roadmap, you can find that on Nintex Community
If you have questions about Nintex Ideas, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org
If you require support, please visit Nintex Customer Central
If you have a sales inquiry, please contact email@example.com
When I view the Document Library, I found it quite disengaging to see the amount of content that are not going to be viewed within the library. Have had similar feedback from staff.
If it does load, only the first 20 records are showing. It takes another minute or two to load the next page.
Also, for the ability of Promasters who are also PO/PE to separate out what is actually due for their review vs what is there just because they are a Promaster.
It is currently really difficult for me to locate what is actually due for my review (because I am the PO/PE) vs what I need to chase someone else for because they are the PO/PE and I'm only seeing it as a Promaster
- What if those documents are used across multiple processes? They may be appropriate for that process being reviewed, but out of date for other associated processes
- What if the process reviewer is not a document owner?
We acknowledge the pain point here, and need to conduct further research before implementation.
It is defintely double handling that they need to review documents, images, forms seperately to the process especially as part of updating a process or reviewing it they are conciencous and going into those documents and making sure the content is up to date. They then feel like they are being punished and have to perform the same tick and flick task by going into a document (which they have already reviewed as part of a process) and having to mark it off as reviewed.