Nintex Ideas

đź‘‹ Use this site to provide feedback and ideas for all Nintex Products. See our post on Nintex Community "Welcome to Nintex Ideas" for more details on Nintex Ideas, how an idea is handled by our product teams and more!


If you have questions about Nintex Ideas, please contact ideas@nintex.com

If you require support, please visit Nintex Customer Central

If you have a sales inquiry, please contact sales@nintex.com

Add a new idea Subscribe
Status Open for voting
Workspace Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp)
Categories Risk and Compliance Management
Created by Guest
Created on Jun 10, 2019

RELATED IDEAS

Risk - Assign Risks To A Role

I administer the Promapp Risks Module. Risk in the module can only be assigned to a person (name) not to a role. This means there is a lot of manual handling when someone leaves. Treatments can be assigned to a role – which works better because you add the role and the person changes automatically. It would be good if risks could also be assigned to a role (or an individual) the same as treatments. This would reduce manual handling and ensure risks remain current.
  • ADMIN RESPONSE
    Sep 7, 2022
    We are working on some other transfer/delegation functionality and that may address this issue as well. More to come as we dig in.
  • Attach files
  • Melissa Hardiman
    May 7, 2025

    We are currently adding our risks and controls and uplifting processes under Critical Owners for CPS230 implementation. There are discrepancies in the ability to add an owner of Processes, risks and controls between roles and individuals. Ideally, to support ongoing Operational resilience obligations, we need to assign at Role Level to allow for movements of staff and also to add alternate owners to accommodate for leave/ absence. Can you please advise if this can be considered for improvement.

    Reply