Ideas

Promasters should receive a Notification Warning when only 25% of Process Map Threshold remains.

This is useful as a warning would ensure action can be taken prior to reaching the Threshold.

Michelle Hatton over 2 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Dashboard & Notifications 0 Open for voting

2 VOTE

Improved wording and explaination in error messages

It would be fantastic if there were a variety of error messages instead of the generic "Whoops that wasn't meant to happen" and "Contact your Promaster" error messages. Current when users come across those error messages they will contact the Prom...

Guest over 5 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / General 1 Open for voting

2 VOTE

Aditional User Type allowed to Create Porcesses in Certain Allocated Groups

There seems to be no middle ground between allowing all users to create process maps to then restricting it to only POs,PMs and BAs. It would be good to allow some users to be able to create process maps in selected groups, but not give them the s...

James Hemming over 5 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / User Management 2 Open for voting

1 VOTE

Prevent the auto-publication of all variations when global process title is changed.

This can be exploited as a means to bypass the approval workflow, any unpublished changes will be published when this change is made.

Tim C over 2 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Process Variations 0 Open for voting

2 VOTE

Correlate the Out of Date Processes 'donut' number with the linked report

The report generated by clicking 'View Report' on the Total Processes donut (on either the Governance Dashboard or at the bottom of the Promapp homepage) does not reconcile with the number shown on the donut. Promapp have confirmed this is because...

Noala Degasperis over 5 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Reporting 1 Open for voting

2 VOTE

Revert Variation to Original > Having an option to copy an SOP variation to the Process Template

No description provided

Guest over 5 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Process Variations 1 Open for voting

2 VOTE

Change the term "decline" to something a little more user friendly

Some of my staff have been offended and put off redoing their processes when I decline them (perhaps they are feeling a little touchy) by the harsh word decline and have asked if we can change this word to something a little more user friendly - I...

Alison over 5 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Process Review & Approval 1 Open for voting

1 VOTE

@mention any Process Manager user

Currently, you can only @mention users/stakeholders who are directly involved when providing feedback on a process. Sometimes you may need to request information or actions from users who are not considered 'directly involved'. It would be great t...

Guest almost 3 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Process Creation & Editing 0 Open for voting

1 VOTE

Bulk Transfer of Documents to another staff member

There is a Transfer process option on the user but no Transfer Document option. This makes it very time consuming if a staff person changes Job role as it has to be done one by one via the document library looking up by individual name.

Unknown Unknown almost 3 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Documents 0 Open for voting

2 VOTE

Ability to change ordering of Systems under Map view

Systems are currently ordered alphabetically when selecting the 'Systems' option within the map view of a process. Is it possible to add a feature where a user could choose to order them by 'Step(s)' instead?

Guest over 5 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / General 1 Open for voting

Please enter your email address

FILTER BY CATEGORY