Skip to Main Content
Nintex Ideas

đź‘‹ Use this site to provide feedback and ideas for all Nintex Products. See our post on Nintex Community "Welcome to Nintex Ideas" for more details on Nintex Ideas, how an idea is handled by our product teams and more!


If you have questions about Nintex Ideas, please contact ideas@nintex.com

If you require support, please visit Nintex Customer Central

If you have a sales inquiry, please contact sales@nintex.com

ADD A NEW IDEA

Process Creation & Editing

Showing 85 of 2507

Process Name

Today we can create multiple processes with the same name (title). Can we not have a feature like Gmail or something like that, that prompts the user while saving the process with the same name? Furthermore, the user should be allowed to decide wh...
Reshma Parkar about 2 months ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Process Creation & Editing 0 Reported as bug

Improved Functionality for Transitioning Processes between Owner/Experts

In order to better support transitions in process ownership, whether they are published or in development, I propose the following functionality be added. Break the Publish Now feature for Promaster's into 3 separate functions/Button. 1. Transitio...

Ability to add text/note beneath a linked process

It would be helpful to be able to add text beneath a linked process to add context or specific instructions within a wider process. It would also be useful to be able to edit the name of the process to fit in to the wider process that it's linked...
James Allen over 3 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Process Creation & Editing 2 Open for voting

Process Owner and Expert

Currently you can only have 1 expert and owner. You should be able to have at least 2 experts, as some processes are cross functional so it's useful to know who to ask. Additionally you should be able to have a 'department' or group as the owner a...
Guest almost 3 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Process Creation & Editing 3 Open for voting

Move Triggers and Inputs section on Procedure to the top

Wouldn't it make sense for the 'Triggers and Inputs' section to be at the top rather than at the end of the procedure. They are supposed to support the user experience by providing information on what triggers the process yet most users would not ...
Guest almost 3 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Process Creation & Editing 5 Open for voting

Case sensitive glossary

It would be good to have a Glossary that is case sensitive. Currently IT (Information Technology) is being tagged every time we use the word 'it'.
Guest almost 5 years ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Process Creation & Editing 5 Not Planned

Control which users/roles/privileges can see cost information on processes

Is it possible to make some processes private or restricted so only certain people can view it. Our users are concerned that if they add the financial details to specific roles, especially roles where only one person is employed such as a COO, tho...
Guest over 1 year ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Process Creation & Editing / User Management 0 Open for voting

Reduce the headers and footers to maximise the editing panel for small screens

When working on a laptop screen (14") the panel for editing a procedure is taken up by the activity header (name, roles, add buttons etc) and a footer (save, view map buttons) leaving only 6 lines of text to 'operate' within. This makes moving ste...

Linking roles to a Team created in Users

When an activity has more than 6 roles attached to it, the only option is to create a team to cover the relevant roles. However, when you have numerous individuals attached to that team, it makes it a administrative burden to constantly monitor an...

Process Generation Copilot

Ability to build and customize assistants that users can integrate with via a prompt or conversational interface.
Jonathan Butler 3 months ago in Nintex Process Manager (formerly Promapp) / Process Creation & Editing 0 Open for voting